Monday, June 8, 2009

Change in the Law

Dear Agents of Change,


I apologize for my absence as I have been roughing it in beautiful Carmel California for a few weeks.


We have now received dozens of letters from lawmakers responding to our mail blitz.
The below bill (s. 1007) is a step in the right direction (as long as they don’t screw it up by adding junk to it). This bill follows a big part of our recommendation by requiring 60% shareholder approval if compensation exceeds 100 times the average employee.


Steve Hartnett




Senate Leader Introduces Bill Limiting Deductible Compensation
Issue: Executive/Deferred Compensation


Date: May 11, 2009


Action Taken: On May 7, the Senate Democrats’ second-in-command, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL), introduced S.1007--the Excessive Pay Capped Deduction Act of 2009-- a bill that would impose a limit on the deductibility of compensation paid to any company employee. At the same time, he also introduced S.1006, a bill that would require a supermajority of publicly traded company shareholders to approve compensation payable to any company employees if that compensation package were to be in excess of the limit. The limit is 100 times the company’s average compensation.


Although passage is not imminent, because of Sen. Durbin’s stature in the U.S. Senate, S. 1006 and S.1007 convey a very strong “message” of where leaders of the Senate may wish to head in future tax legislative debates. The bills serve two purposes. First, they respond to public anger over perceived excessive bonuses paid to employees of some financial institutions. Second, S. 1007 could raise tax revenue to fund new programs.


Background: The Durbin legislation is intended to be comprehensive. It applies to all companies, regardless of their size or structure. It defines compensation as including wages, salary, fees, commissions, fringe benefits, deferred compensation, retirement contributions, options, bonuses, property and any other form of compensation identified by the Treasury Department. It includes part-time and partial year workers’ compensation (annualized) in the formula for calculating a company’s average compensation.


S.1007 also requires companies that are paying “excessive compensation” (amounts over the deductible limit) to report to Treasury. The report must include the amounts of compensation paid to the company’s lowest-paid and highest-paid workers, the company’s average compensation amount, and the number of workers who are being paid “excessive compensation.” The report must also include the amount of compensation being paid to those receiving “excessive compensation.” S.1007 would be effective after the date of enactment. The Senate Finance Committee has jurisdiction over the bill.


The Excessive Pay Shareholder Approval Act, S.1006, would require 60 percent of a publicly-traded company’s shareholders to approve any pay packages larger than 100 times the average compensation paid to the company’s workers. S.1006 is in the jurisdiction of the Senate’s Banking Committee.


Next Steps: The Durbin bills join the currently stalled legislative attempts to penalize “excessive” bonuses like those paid to AIG executives and the Finance Committee’s $1 million cap on deferred compensation. Tax insiders believe that when Congress turns its attention to tax legislation—whether because of the need to extend expiring tax provisions, or to address the problem of the scheduled expiration of the estate tax next year, or to raise revenue for healthcare reform—these executive and deferred compensation bills will be in the forefront of the debate. Timing is not yet clear, but most tax policy watchers on and off the Hill think tax legislation will start to develop sometime this summer.

1 comment:

  1. ***Agents for Change - FACEBOOK "SISTER" GROUP of like-minded people wanting to participate and join in the Cause.***

    Good evening everyone!
    AGENTS FOR CHANGE was created in hopes of providing a backup voice for the concept's creator, Stephen P. Hartnett. I will not presume to have the authority to actually commit to a mission statement, but I think I can sum up the goals and the outlook of the group and its members:
    We believe that EXCESSIVE executive compensation has caused almost insurmountable damage to the American Nation and her foundation as a capitalistic State. Executives of large corporations (**not all execs, mind you, but a percentage**), have raped not only the company but the rights and peace of mind of the American people, the Shareholders, and the capitalistic Ideal. Examples of this are, unfortunately, incalculable, and several of them have been used as examples for congress. Since the conception of this group only a few short months ago, this small grass roots movement has created a ripple effect that can be felt all the way to Washington, as evidenced by the President's response to Mr. Hartnett's efforts, and the drafting of bill (pending) - this is a very exiting time for our members, because it has become obvious that we are being heard! Now that we have the attention of policy makers and the White-house, it is VITAL that we work even harder to impress upon them the importance of not allowing these violations to continue and remind them of the consequences that are inevitable if this type of executive frivolity continues! **AND THEN BEGINS STAGE II** Naturally, different people with different agendas will want to twist and manipulate this issue to meet their own end, and this could very well destroy the spirit in which this group and others like it, was founded upon. Therefore, VIGILANCE with congress, media, and the overall American mood is essential. Perhaps even more importantly, is keeping up-to-date with the LAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS regarding executive change (and being on the lookout for loopholes). We certainly don't want to see a knee-jerk reaction that thwarts the spirit of capitalism in its true form, but would like to see the executives of large corporations become ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT (insofar as realistically possible) to the investors of their companies and the consumer. This means proving their monetary worth and justifying their compensation to not only their board, but to the company's shareholders as well. It's about accountability and honest business! The Shareholders are the very cornerstone of any private company, and must be able to TRUST those that are manning the vessel! Remember, the Shareholders should always come first, and without them, there is no investment, no company......
    With gratitude,
    Dionne Hartnett

    ReplyDelete